Menu:

 
Dear Sergio,

This has been an enlightening week; I’m so glad we decided to have this semi-public conversation about minimalism. I feel like I’ve got a better idea of what those internet minimalists are up to and where their struggles match up with my own.

I’ve also confirmed my initial suspicion: that minimalism and spirituality are related around profound issues. Issues like simplicity, connection, and intentionality. As we wrap up our week I want to add another issue that I know is a spiritual one and see if you think it plays out in minimalism as well.

I’ve flirted with the idea of Sabbath for years now, though never been a true adherent. It’s a religious word, of course, but more and more people are coming to see Sabbath as a human practice rather than merely a religious one. I’ve had this book on my shelf for months now, and I know the author thinks Sabbath practice is for everyone—gentile, Jew, or secular humanist—though I haven’t read it yet. I keep pushing it off, which is probably significant.

The reason I love the idea of Sabbath and think it goes with the conversation we’ve been having this week is that it combines several of the major themes of our discussion while adding the notion of time. Sabbath is meant to strengthen our human connections, to lead us towards mindfulness, and to give us an experience of simplicity. It also teaches us about time—about the pace at which we choose to live, and about how quality is as significant as quantity. We can’t always live in Sabbath time, which is why they are traditionally just one day in seven, but that weekly retreat into a different time and space changes the rest of our time and space for the other six days.

I’ve had different Sabbath practices over the years, though mostly they’ve been pretty amateur dabbling. I currently have a Facebook and email Sabbath practice most Fridays (I’m cheating today, obviously) which lines right up with the digital vacation idea you pointed up Wednesday.

There’s more to Sabbath than not-doing though, or there should be. It really is an exercise in manipulating the human experience of time. My morning coffee reading the past couple weeks has been Slow Time by Waverly Fitzgerald. Though not specifically affiliated with any particular religion, it’s both a spiritual and practical look at our relationship with time. As far as time management books go, this one’s the best (and not coincidentally least ordinary) of those I’ve come across.

From what you’ve said, I think that being present in the moment is a product of minimalism. This is another deep concept that many wisdom and religious traditions share. The first breath prayer I ever learned was about presence in time. It was taught to me by the chaplain at summer camp I attended in high school. It’s easy. As you breath in, you say to yourself, “A Time.” As you breath back out, the words are, “To Embrace.” A deep breath—“A time to embrace”. To this day it is the most powerful prayer I know. It never fails to snap me back to the moment, to the present, even if—no, especially if—the present moment isn’t a good one.

So here’s to the pursuit of minimalism, spirituality, and a life lived well. There’s much we’ve left unsaid, and perhaps there’s room for a sequel somewhere down the line. I’ve enjoyed this so much, friend.

Peace be with you,

Ben.

• • • • •

Dear Ben,

What a pleasure it’s been to have this conversation with you over the course of the week. Although I imagined we would find a good deal of common ground between monasticism and minimalism, reading your thoughts certainly opened my eyes to new things. Anyone who’s known me for more than ten minutes, knows that I favor extremes and that I tend to jump headfirst into whatever thing or idea happens to strike my fancy.

I’ve made an effort this time around to practice moderation in hopes that this does not become simply another fleeting phase, but rather a lifestyle. Believe me, the temptation to get rid of everything but the clothes I’m wearing is strong and ever present. But realizing that there is something deeper and more meaningful to this than whatever may be the number of my possessions keeps me grounded.

Discovering how much ancient and current practices in monasticism and spirituality have in common with minimalism has been reassuring. It’s not that I was looking for validation, but knowing these things makes me think there is something truly worthy, fulfilling and sustainable about this pursuit. While I don’t consider myself a spiritual person, I appreciate the benefits spiritual practices and disciplines. I will be thinking about the things we’ve discussed for some time, and I will likely make them a part of my minimalist approach to life.

I’m pleased you have chosen to talk about Sabbath. This is a perfect example of the kind of spiritually-rooted practice even a humanist minimalist can greatly benefit from.  I have experienced something powerful about purposefully setting apart a time to withdraw from quotidian life and do (or not do, as the case may be) something that slows us down. What I most look forward to in a Sabbath experience is stillness. It can be the stillness the psalmist refers to, “be still and know…” But as you’ve mentioned, Sabbath mustn’t be limited to Abrahamic expressions of faith. It doesn’t necessarily have to be spiritual at all, right?

Some of the best moments of stillness for me came many years ago as I meditated upon the Tao, of which my favorite proverb was (and still is), “the way to do is to be.” Later on, while practicing Shotokan Karate, our sensei exhorted us to find stillness in movement. Curiously enough, while practicing Bikram Yoga, we were instructed to find movement in stillness. I often experience this stillness during mass, or during a particularly moving concert at the symphony. What I haven’t done is to make a regular practice of it. But I’m going to look into the books you’ve mentioned and perhaps pursue that next.

In closing I would like to once again quote (you guessed it!) Thoreau, “To be a philosopher is not merely to have subtle thoughts, nor even to found a school, but so to love wisdom as to live according to its dictates, a life of simplicity, independence, magnanimity, and trust.” I wouldn’t call myself a philosopher, but this certainly describes the kind of life I want to live. As I see it, minimalism is not the end, but rather one of the means by which to reach this goal. It’s the means that happens to be working for me at the moment.

Thank you and thank you again for taking the time to engage in this dialog. I have rather enjoyed it and I have truly learned more than a few things. Talk to you soon, my friend.

Most sincerely,

-Sergio.

 
 
[Note: This letter is part of a week long email exchange between me and my friend Sergio on the topic of minimalism]

Dear Sergio,

We set Wednesday aside to talk about relationships, with the clever subtitle, “digital vs. analog”. As I tell people about this little project of ours, this is the question people ask most: how can a new minimalism movement be out there on twitter and facebook and blogs and the internet? That doesn’t seem very minimalist to me!

I’m sure you’ve given this topic much thought; I’ve followed your struggle with your smart phone, and while I haven’t felt the need to go as far as you have, I’ve also found myself attempting to draw some boundaries between myself and the digital world. This might even be the place I’m most interested in the minimalist conversation, for my greatest personal desire is to find a way to exist on the virtual platforms I’ve come to appreciate, and even rely on, while still living as much of my life as possible in a real, engaged, face-to-face, human world.

This is also the place where I have the fewest answers—I’ve got no quotes or wisdom to share yet. I have only two convictions and an anecdote to offer. First, for me anyways, complete rejection of the virtual/digital world is neither desirable nor practical. Even Monks have websites these days! Second, for me anyways, too much digital/virtual life is unhealthy. I know this in my own body though I have no data to back it up with. I feel healthier—physically, mentally, and spiritually—when I have intentional space between me and my digital life.

The anecdote is simply this: a couple years ago I decided to give up facebook. It takes too much time, it’s full of frivolous and unfulfilling junk, and with few exceptions I was interacting with people I could interact with in other, better ways. Then one of my parishioners was deployed to Iraq. She had access to a computer and I could still send email, but one-on-one email conversation was too time consuming in an already stressful environment. By sending her individual emails I was adding to her work load. Yet she could use facebook. Its ability to communicate short messages with many people easily, allowed her to stay in touch within the time she had in a way that felt honest and real to her. I’ve never unplugged the ubiquitous social network since. I still have a love/hate (or should that be like/dislike?) relationship with FB, but it’s proven its worth to me in real human terms.

I hope you have some wisdom for me today, friend!

Peace,

Ben.

* * *

Dear Ben,

The use of social networking sites is only one of many things that make the current wave of minimalism seem paradoxical. Many a time, while following the endless stream of minimalist tweets, I’ve asked myself the same question as your parishioners. How is that being minimalist? I still don’t know for sure, but I certainly feel that for me the problem with social networking sites (and the Internet in general) is how much of my time they can consume if I’m not careful.

Before I go any further, I want to make it very clear that I love Facebook. Having family and dear friends spread out over the country and outside of the country, Facebook has enabled me to feel present (albeit, virtually) in their lives. Much like you describe with your parishioner in the service, it is simply more manageable to have a live feed and pick and choose what to read and interact with, than to correspond via e-mail. A lot of people, some of them minimalists, have intentionally left Facebook recently and they make very convincing arguments for having done so. I admit the idea has crossed my mind more than once, but I can tell you I won’t be quitting Facebook anytime soon.

What I have done is to practice moderation in the digital space. Just a few months ago, you could’ve known what I was doing, thinking, eating and “liking” every hour of the day by following my Facebook stream. It was too much, nobody needs (or wants) to know all of that. Emily would poke fun at my penchant for posting every little thing, “go ahead, if it’s not on Facebook, it hasn’t happened.” What’s worse is that by being perpetually sucked into my little screen, I was missing out on all the life happening outside, in the physical world. All of this ended the moment I got rid of my iPhone. Now that my access to Facebook, Twitter and Gmail require a computer, I find myself going for long periods of time without tweeting or updating my status. This is very quickly restoring the balance between my online life and my offline life.

I realize not everybody is as hooked on the digital world as I was. I do, however, think we are communally spending more time online than we should. No amount of “liking,” commenting or “tagging” can replace the physical company of friends and loved ones. I see the value in being connected to those far away, but I’m afraid this is beginning to happen more and more at the expense of those nearby. I know this was the case with me and I have seen what a difference limiting my screen time has made. Like you, I feel better, healthier, truly happy when my online time is intentional and limited.

The way many minimalist bloggers approach social networking and Internet time in general is by intentionally scheduling time offline. You are no stranger to this, I remember being put off by your ability and desire to be “off the grid” while on vacation, leaving Internet enabled devices at home and all. “What?! You don’t want everyone to know you’re on a boat RIGHT THIS MOMENT!?” Minimalists such as Leo Babauta advocate digital vacations. This is something I have enjoyed doing and something I think anyone can benefit from. While I don’t wish to leave Facebook, I do periodically deactivate my account for a week or so, something I find both liberating and refreshing. If you approach it like a fast or a Lenten discipline, you soon realize that it’s not about what you’re giving up but about what you’re gaining.

I’m learning everyday about moderation and mindfulness. Moderation allows me to limit my screen time so I can be present in the moment. Mindfulness helps me make every interaction online count (I’m down to one status update a day. Baby steps…). I’m rediscovering the joys of having a dinner out without “checking in” and telling the world how wonderful the falafel sandwich is. I’m realizing that not every single cute thing my baby does needs to be posted on Facebook. Some memories, some moments are best not captured. And when it comes to relationships with others, I am finding more and more that I need to disconnect in order to connect.

Sincerely,

-Sergio.
 
 
[Note: This letter is part of a week long email exchange between me and my friend Sergio on the topic of minimalism]

Ben,

Today we're talking about possessions, and I have a confession to make: I’m obsessed with stuff. Only it's not the kind of obsession you see on TV; you might even say it's the opposite of hoarding. Not a day goes by without me asking myself, or Emily, questions like "do we need to keep this?" and, "when was the last time we used it?" If I lived on my own, my apartment would be perpetually empty, as though it were waiting for its next tenant. But don't worry, it's not serious, just one of the things I like to think about.

Something else I like to think about is storage, particularly as it relates to stuff. Did you know that one of the fastest-growing sectors of commercial real estate is the self storage industry? With a collective $20+ billion in annual revenues, the industry is so strong that Wall Street analysts have deemed it "recession resistant." The fact sheet available at the Self Storage Association website has some impressive insights, but the one that I find truly captivating is this:

Total self storage rentable space in the US is now 2.22 billion square feet (as of Q4-2009).  That figure represents more than 78 square miles of rentable self storage space, under roof – or an area well more than 3 times the size of Manhattan Island.

That's three Manhattan Island's worth of stuff that no longer fits in our closets, garages and attics! We have more than enough stuff to support the booming self storage industry, the National Association of Professional Organizers, businesses such as The Container Store (stuff to put your stuff in) and TV shows like Clean Sweep.

Of course I haven’t made any new discoveries here, we all know we could use a little bit of spring cleaning. But I’m taken by the sadness there is in all of this. Tom Vanderbilt refers to this sadness in an article on Slate about self storage, these possessions we store away are "mementos we somehow can't live with, and yet can't live without, and exemplify the downside of acquisition.”

And then I think about monastic life. I think about men and women who seem perfectly content and fulfilled, while possessing little to nothing at all. I look at online pictures of monastic cells and think of Thoreau’s descriptions of his cabin at Walden. These are all people for whom the concept of self-storage couldn’t be stranger if you made it up. What is the secret? How does monasticism enable people to detach from material things? Would we be happier, more fulfilled, if like monks, our possessions were fewer?

Simply,

-Sergio.


* * *

Sergio,

We might be the wrong people to talk about the temptation of having too much stuff, as I share your predilection towards getting rid of extraneous things wherever possible. Instead let me say something positive, first personally then monastically, about possessions.

I love things. The desk I’m sitting at right now is made from dark stained hardwood, solid throughout, with a hammer-textured surface and a matching hutch with little cubbies. The bag I use most days is soft leather, lined with a cool patterned fabric; it fits my netbook computer and one book perfectly. Last week I bought a beautiful bamboo dish rack and I’ve been enjoying the hell out of doing the dishes ever since. I’m a tactile person by nature, and I love good things. Long ago I took to heart this quote: “Have nothing in your house that you do not know to be useful, or believe to be beautiful.” William Morris said that, though I only just now looked it up. Whoever said it to me added the line, “…preferably both.”

Which leads me to one of my favorite chapters of The Rule of St. Benedict. Besides the obvious stuff (prayers, vows, etc.) Benedict’s Rule contains some wonderful thoughts about things. When it comes to possessions, the saint devotes all 147 words of chapter 33 to saying that monks may not have any possessions at all, not “even their bodies or wills”. Chapter 31, however, is 717 words long, and concerns the Cellarer:

Let him regard all the utensils of the monastery
and its whole property
as if they were the sacred vessels of the altar.
Let him not think that he may neglect anything.
He should be neither a miser
nor a prodigal and squanderer of the monastery's substance,
but should do all things with measure.”


The Cellarer, if it isn’t clear from the text, is that monk who acts as chief purveyor of all foodstuffs to the monastery, and as general steward. In other words, while monks don’t own anything individually, they do own things in common, and those things are precious, no matter how humble.

We’ve come to the same point, I believe. Appreciation—even reverence—for good and useful and beautiful things is exclusive of the kind of acquisitive consumerism that leads to the need for 2.22 billion square feet of self-storage. I’ve just tried to say it in a positive way. It’s a fine line and a narrow path; Jesus himself recommends a radical minimalism to his disciples when he sends them out to proclaim the kingdom of God: “He said to them, ‘Take nothing for your journey, no staff, nor bag, nor bread, nor money—not even an extra tunic.’ (Luke 9:3)”

Light Journeys,

-Ben.
 
 
[Note: This letter is part of a week long email exchange between me and my friend Sergio on the topic of minimalism]

Sergio,

We’ve set today aside to define minimalism and our conversation. I have two over-arching question-concepts that I’m bringing to this conversation. The first is a notion of simplicity that has shaped and defined my spirituality from its beginning. The second is a fascination with monasticism that goes back nearly as far.

During my sophomore year of High School the church I was loosely affiliated with got a new priest. On his first Sunday I introduced myself by saying that I A) wanted to officially join the church, B) needed to get baptized ASAP, and C) was going to be a priest when I grew up. I had decided all of these things for myself just a couple months earlier. At the time I figured this would deeply impress this new priest. Having now the benefit of ten years of ordained ministry I realize he probably thought I was nominating myself for the position of first pain-in-the-ass of his tenure.

To his credit he took me seriously enough that I didn’t notice otherwise. He showed me to his barely unpacked office and handed me Freedom of Simplicity by Richard Foster, a copy of which still sits on my bookshelf. Like High School itself, the book lost some of its profundity when I went back to it as an adult, but the message has never left me.

The lessons for me were two. First, that life is inherently simple. Second, that difficulty is not the opposite of simplicity, but complexity is. Thus, the spiritual life is not necessarily easy, but it is simple. It seems to me that some natural relationship must exist between this idea and the new interest in minimalism.

The second question-concept I’ll be bringing to this conversation is monasticism. I’ve been fascinated by monks for all of my ordained life. I’ll be going to The Rule of St. Benedict many times this week. My particular fascination as relates to minimalism is what they call “third order” vows. These are kind of affiliate positions that regular people can take in relationship with monastic communities. You don’t become a monastic yourself, but you live by some kind of rule adapted for life in the modern world.

That’s exactly what I’m looking for—have been looking for most of my life since waking to spirituality: a way to bear some of that monastic reality into the world. I’m hoping an engagement with minimalism will yield further insights on how to take another step along that path.

I’m looking forward to your thoughts. Have a simple day, friend!

-Ben.

* * *

Ben,

While I have only recently started referring to myself as a minimalist, I have always been drawn to orderliness and simplicity. This inclination can oftentimes be easily observed, as in the unusual way a cluttered room alters my mood. Other times it's not as easy to comprehend, as in my aversion to multitasking. Minimalism provides ways for me to have the simpler, more fulfilled life that I want.

So, how do we define minimalism? Well, I suppose it depends on whom you ask. A great number of bloggers are currently addressing this question. Some choose to be very specific about the number of things they own (100 items for minimalists, 50 or less for radical minimalists). Others are quitting their day jobs and deliberately living under the poverty line. Some are simplifying to eliminate debt. Another bunch are finding minimalism fashionable. Some just love a good challenge. Whatever form it takes, we all seem to be reacting to what we see as a consumerist culture in which our wants and our needs are terribly out of balance. This, we think, has led us to be unhappy and unfulfilled, continuously seeking to buy or add the next new thing to our already cluttered life. The answer, as we see it, is to live a simpler, unencumbered life.

While in his tiny cabin at Walden Pond, Henry David Thoreau conducted a two-year experiment in simple living. "Simplicity, simplicity, simplicity," was his refrain. He exemplified the way in which a life with just the "necessaries" could be not only possible, but also fulfilling. Of course, monks had already been living this way for a very long time. But we must understand Thoreau as a product of the society and environment in which he lived, a culture which he saw as obsessed with work and materialism. Although written over a hundred and fifty years ago, Walden rings true even today. I will probably refer to it more than once as our conversation develops.

What I see in monasticism and spirituality are opportunities to meaningfully and intentionally use the space, time and resources that minimalism has made available. Giving stuff away, selling and donating things, reclaiming closet and living spaces are all fun and good. But soon enough you realize that unless you fill these newly emptied spaces with meaning and intention, minimalism can just as easily become another fad.

I believe, as you have stated, that life is inherently simple and I am quite fond of the idea that "difficulty is not the opposite of simplicity, but complexity is." I look forward to the new ways in which your knowledge of monasticism will add more meaning to my minimalism. And I hope that whatever little I have to offer in the way of minimalism will help us discover ways in which to make monasticism a part of our daily lives.

Kindest regards,

-Sergio.